Growing clearly faster than similar-size accounts โ on the way up.
Followers 685Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 14:37
BScore 69
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 ยท 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
68
Views per post โ 78.7% of followers ยท ahead of 68% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
99
Followers +28.61% in 7 days ยท ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
โ
Needs at least 3 tweets past 24h in the last 14 days
Posting cadence
21
4 posts in the last 14 days, on 4 of them
Content consistency
โ
Needs at least 5 tweets past 24h in the last 14 days
Findings
Strengths
Growth momentumFollowers +28.61% in 7 days ยท ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
View efficiencyViews per post โ 78.7% of followers ยท ahead of 68% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Posting cadence4 posts in the last 14 days, on 4 of them
Suggestions
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (โ โ3ร the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only โ it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
