Followers 27.2KDiagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 21:46
BScore 62
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
83
Views per post ≈ 331.3% of followers · ahead of 83% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
44
Followers +1.07% in 7 days · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
7
2.7 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 7% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
315 posts in the last 12 days, on 12 of them
Content consistency
93
The top post took 8% of 14-day views (138 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence315 posts in the last 12 days, on 12 of them
Content consistencyThe top post took 8% of 14-day views (138 posts)
To improve
Engagement quality2.7 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 7% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentumFollowers +1.07% in 7 days · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Plenty of views, little interactionWhat to doEnd posts with a clear question and answer the first few replies.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether likes and replies per 1,000 views have gone up.
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.