Posts regularly and each one performs evenly — a consistently run account.
Followers 11.8KDiagnosed on 2026-11-13Followers 11-13 08:07Tweets 11-13 02:45
CScore 45
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
27
Views per post ≈ 17.7% of followers · ahead of 27% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
20
Followers +0.35% in 7 days · ahead of 20% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
57
10.8 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 57% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
45 posts in the last 8 days, on 8 of them
Content consistency
57
The top post took 45% of 14-day views (45 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence45 posts in the last 8 days, on 8 of them
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers +0.35% in 7 days · ahead of 20% of similar-size accounts
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 17.7% of followers · ahead of 27% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
Views lag behind the follower countWhat to doLook at the top tweets by views and reuse their topics and openings.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether views per post ÷ followers has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
