Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 23.1KDiagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 14:40
BScore 60
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views dropped sharplyMedian views per post over the last 7 days are 64% below the 7 days before. It may be a change in topics or timing, or reduced distribution — public data can't tell which.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
49
Views per post ≈ 32.0% of followers · ahead of 49% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
50
Followers +1.64% in 7 days · ahead of 50% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
49
8.8 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 49% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
121 posts in the last 14 days, on 14 of them
Content consistency
79
The top post took 23% of 14-day views (49 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence121 posts in the last 14 days, on 14 of them
Content consistencyThe top post took 23% of 14-day views (49 posts)
To improve
No clear weak spot.
Suggestions
Keep the current rhythm, and keep an eye on the lowest score above.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
