Building http://startupslab.site DM for Collab or https://colleator.com/hardikgohil
Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.
| Metric | Today | Yesterday | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tweet views | ≥ 11.7K | ≥ 3,409 | ≥ 18.2K | ≥ 18.2K | ≥ 18.2K |
| Posts | 3 | 1 | ≥ 5 | ≥ 5 | ≥ 5 |
| Replies sent | 157 | 32 | ≥ 189 | ≥ 189 | ≥ 189 |
| Growth | −3 | — | — | — | — |
| Avg views / post | 3,093 | 3,093 | 3,093 | 3,093 | 3,093 |
| Top post | ≥ 2,538 | ≥ 2,598 | ≥ 3,093 | ≥ 3,093 | ≥ 3,093 |
This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 10-10 03:03), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.
X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". The amber bar beside each cycle is the estimate kept from before it was paid, to show how close it came. "This cycle so far" is an estimate, always $ per million views × this cycle's views (average daily tweet views over the last 14 days, replies included, retweets not, × days elapsed). Accounts with a known payout use their own rate (payout ÷ that cycle's views, with 14 days of the account's average daily views standing in where that cycle wasn't fully collected); others use the site-wide average, currently $143.49. The average comes from 79 accounts with a known payout. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.
Another X payout just landed. $196.60 this time. I was expecting $230–250, but hey, it's still money earned by posting online.
Some vibe coders are building products they couldn't maintain without AI. Some software engineers are writing code manually that AI could generate in seconds. Both groups think they're winning.
Hot take: Vibe coders can build apps, but they'll never build lasting careers if AI is doing all the thinking for them.
ChatGPT Codex is testing my patience. Explain the same requirements 4-5 times...still messes things up. Give Antigravity one prompt. Gets the job done. The difference is wild.
A $10K MRR screenshot gets more respect than 10 years of building a profitable, sustainable business. We've started confusing revenue screenshots with success.
By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.
