Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 17.7KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 14:07Tweets 11-03 08:48
BScore 61
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are +182% versus the previous 7 days — no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
69
Views per post ≈ 215.8% of followers · ahead of 69% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
50
Followers +2.37% in 7 days · ahead of 50% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
53
8.4 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 53% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
87
213 posts in the last 14 days, on 11 of them
Content consistency
46
The top post took 56% of 14-day views (26 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence213 posts in the last 14 days, on 11 of them
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 215.8% of followers · ahead of 69% of similar-size accounts
To improve
No clear weak spot.
Suggestions
Keep the current rhythm, and keep an eye on the lowest score above.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
