A mix of strengths and weak spots — mid-table among similar-size accounts.
Followers 20.9KDiagnosed on 2026-11-12Followers 11-13 02:07Tweets 11-13 03:15
BScore 56
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
67
Views per post ≈ 179.6% of followers · ahead of 67% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
38
Followers +1.49% in 7 days · ahead of 38% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
53
8.7 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 53% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
—
Needs 7 days of tweet data
Content consistency
75
The top post took 26% of 14-day views (57 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Content consistencyThe top post took 26% of 14-day views (57 posts)
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 179.6% of followers · ahead of 67% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers +1.49% in 7 days · ahead of 38% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
