AI Engineer, dedicated to learning and disseminating knowledge about AI, software engineering, and engineering management.
Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.
| Metric | Today | Yesterday | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tweet views | ≥ 50.1K | ≥ 525K | ≥ 1.9M | ≥ 4.7M | ≥ 11.4M |
| Posts | 6 | 12 | 43 | 109 | 255 |
| Replies sent | 2 | 5 | 87 | 155 | 338 |
| Growth | +913 | +280 | +3,323 | +5,123 | +11.4K |
| Avg views / post | 43.9K | 43.9K | 43.9K | 43.9K | 43.9K |
| Top post | ≥ 22.4K | ≥ 144K | ≥ 198K | ≥ 225K | ≥ 259K |
This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 06-20 07:32), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.
X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". The amber bar beside each cycle is the estimate kept from before it was paid, to show how close it came. "This cycle so far" is an estimate, always $ per million views × this cycle's views (average daily tweet views over the last 14 days, replies included, retweets not, × days elapsed). Accounts with a known payout use their own rate (payout ÷ that cycle's views, with 14 days of the account's average daily views standing in where that cycle wasn't fully collected); others use the site-wide average, currently $129.54. The average comes from 333 accounts with a known payout. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.
REA：让 AI 智能体帮你逆向没有源码的软件 开源项目 REA（Reverse Engineer Anything）把逆向分析工具接到了 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 这类 AI 编程智能体上。看到别人 App 里有个好功能，可以让智能体去拆这个程序，讲清楚功能是怎么实现的，附上证据，再在你自己的项目里写一个类似的。逆向分析指的是手里没有源代码，从编译好的程序反推它是怎么写的。 REA 本身是一个 MCP 服务。…
微软向约 6 万名员工提供自愿离职补偿，约占全员四分之一，12 月初前决定 微软 10 月 26 日（周一）给美国、加拿大、英国和印度部分团队的员工发了一份“自愿离职邀约”：愿意走的人，可以拿一笔相当于标准遣散费的补偿离开。符合条件的大约 6 万人。 消息由 Bloomberg 先报出，微软随后在官方博客公布了首席人力官 Amy Coleman 的内部信，并向 GeekWire 确认了 6 万这个数字。 6 万人占多少？微软年报显示，…
Claude Code 团队公开了他们审代码的做法：代码大约九成由 Claude 写，六月到九月合并的修改翻了一倍多，需要撤回的比例反而降了四成多。 这期用一摞带洞的奶酪片讲这套做法：每道检查都会漏，叠起来就很难漏，底下还有一张网兜底。 片中回答五个问题：哪些修改还要人看，AI 审 AI 会不会没完，审查的 AI 漏了怎么办，人不读代码怎么懂代码，出了事算谁的。人不再逐行读代码，时间花在机器做不好的判断上。 视频1: 英文版 视频2:…
用 REA 小试牛刀逆向了 Claude Slides 的 Slides 编辑器，几乎完整功能。（图1） 我的用法很简单，不一定是最佳实践，仅供参考： 1. 先去 Claude Slides 上把核心的脚本和样式表下载下来（图2） 2. 按照 REA 官网的说明让 Codex 安装 REA 3. 使用 REA Skill 去逆向混淆后的代码（图3） 4. 用不了太久就能有一个目录结构不错的代码，但其实里面还挺乱的 5. 然后再用 Cl…
发布 baoyu-design v2，完整的把 Claude Design、Claude Slides 和 Claude Dashboard 移植过来了，和原版体验几乎一致（除了没有评论功能），可以运行在任何 Agent 任何模型，不再依赖于 Claude Artifacts。 完全开源：https://github.com/jimliu/baoyu-design
By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.
