Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 219Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 14:55
DScore 19
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
15
Views per post ≈ 23.0% of followers · ahead of 15% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
—
Needs 7 days of follower snapshots
Engagement quality
32
33.1 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 32% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
9
5 posts in the last 14 days, on 1 of them
Content consistency
—
Needs at least 5 tweets past 24h in the last 14 days
Findings
Strengths
No dimension stands clearly above similar-size accounts yet.
To improve
Posting cadence5 posts in the last 14 days, on 1 of them
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 23.0% of followers · ahead of 15% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
Views lag behind the follower countWhat to doLook at the top tweets by views and reuse their topics and openings.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether views per post ÷ followers has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
