Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 52Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 21:10
CScore 47
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are โ41% versus the previous 7 days โ no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 ยท 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
1
Views per post โ 23.1% of followers ยท ahead of 1% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
93
Followers +5.77% in 7 days ยท ahead of 93% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
45
22.2 likes and replies per 1,000 views ยท ahead of 45% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
57
19 posts in the last 14 days, on 9 of them
Content consistency
55
The top post took 49% of 14-day views (16 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Growth momentumFollowers +5.77% in 7 days ยท ahead of 93% of similar-size accounts
To improve
View efficiencyViews per post โ 23.1% of followers ยท ahead of 1% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Views lag behind the follower countWhat to doLook at the top tweets by views and reuse their topics and openings.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether views per post รท followers has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (โ โ3ร the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only โ it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
