Followers 17.0MDiagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 21:12
BScore 55
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
83
Views per post ≈ 12.5% of followers · ahead of 83% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
20
Followers -0.06% in 7 days · ahead of 20% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
61
24.6 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 61% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
27
6 posts in the last 14 days, on 5 of them
Content consistency
84
The top post took 30% of 14-day views (6 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Content consistencyThe top post took 30% of 14-day views (6 posts)
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 12.5% of followers · ahead of 83% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers -0.06% in 7 days · ahead of 20% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence6 posts in the last 14 days, on 5 of them
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
