A mix of strengths and weak spots โ mid-table among similar-size accounts.
Followers 590Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-02 02:51
BScore 59
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 ยท 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
โ
Needs a tweet past 24h in the last 7 days
Growth momentum
23
Followers +0.00% in 7 days ยท ahead of 23% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
86
78.2 likes and replies per 1,000 views ยท ahead of 86% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
โ
Needs 7 days of tweet data
Content consistency
96
The top post took 10% of 14-day views (16 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Content consistencyThe top post took 10% of 14-day views (16 posts)
Engagement quality78.2 likes and replies per 1,000 views ยท ahead of 86% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers +0.00% in 7 days ยท ahead of 23% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (โ โ3ร the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only โ it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
