Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 6,063Diagnosed on 2026-11-04Followers 11-05 02:07Tweets 11-05 03:25
BScore 67
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
88
Views per post ≈ 968.6% of followers · ahead of 88% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
40
Followers +1.76% in 7 days · ahead of 40% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
48
9.5 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 48% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
91 posts in the last 11 days, on 11 of them
Content consistency
60
The top post took 42% of 14-day views (25 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence91 posts in the last 11 days, on 11 of them
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 968.6% of followers · ahead of 88% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers +1.76% in 7 days · ahead of 40% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
