Growing clearly faster than similar-size accounts — on the way up.
Followers 332KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:16
AScore 77
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
95
Views per post ≈ 136.5% of followers · ahead of 95% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
82
Followers +1.04% in 7 days · ahead of 82% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
73
10.9 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 73% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
33
5 posts in the last 11 days, on 5 of them
Content consistency
85
The top post took 32% of 14-day views (5 posts)
Findings
Strengths
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 136.5% of followers · ahead of 95% of similar-size accounts
Content consistencyThe top post took 32% of 14-day views (5 posts)
To improve
Posting cadence5 posts in the last 11 days, on 5 of them
Suggestions
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
