Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 3,099Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 21:27
CScore 45
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
79
Views per post ≈ 191.9% of followers · ahead of 79% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
25
Followers +0.23% in 7 days · ahead of 25% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
15
6.0 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 15% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
33
8 posts in the last 14 days, on 6 of them
Content consistency
70
The top post took 40% of 14-day views (7 posts)
Findings
Strengths
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 191.9% of followers · ahead of 79% of similar-size accounts
Content consistencyThe top post took 40% of 14-day views (7 posts)
To improve
Engagement quality6.0 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 15% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentumFollowers +0.23% in 7 days · ahead of 25% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Plenty of views, little interactionWhat to doEnd posts with a clear question and answer the first few replies.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether likes and replies per 1,000 views have gone up.
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
