AI 시대에 콘텐츠 크리에이터로 발버둥치기 AI creator : Newtake Creator CPP: DomoAI, PolloAI, http://Cuddler.ai contact : [email protected]
Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.
| Metric | Today | Yesterday | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tweet views | ≥ 77.0K | ≥ 191K | ≥ 525K | ≥ 972K | ≥ 2.2M |
| Posts | 38 | 45 | 210 | 365 | 771 |
| Replies sent | 512 | 647 | 3,334 | 5,621 | 9,998 |
| Growth | +34 | +20 | +184 | +278 | +638 |
| Avg views / post | 2,177 | 2,177 | 2,177 | 2,177 | 2,177 |
| Top post | ≥ 7,946 | ≥ 53.1K | ≥ 53.1K | ≥ 95.3K | ≥ 358K |
This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 09-26 11:50), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.
X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". The amber bar beside each cycle is the estimate kept from before it was paid, to show how close it came. "This cycle so far" is an estimate, always $ per million views × this cycle's views (average daily tweet views over the last 14 days, replies included, retweets not, × days elapsed). Accounts with a known payout use their own rate (payout ÷ that cycle's views, with 14 days of the account's average daily views standing in where that cycle wasn't fully collected); others use the site-wide average, currently $137.50. The average comes from 404 accounts with a known payout. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.
안 그래도 이번에 Gemini 4 Argon이 공개되면서 해당 AI 모델을 사용해서 웹소설 자동화를 시도하는 분들이 우후죽순 생길 것이라 우려의 목소리를 냈는데 실제로 하나둘 그런 사례들이 나오고 있음. 자기가 AI를 쓰고 있다고 말하는 사람이 오히려 소수일 것이고, 상당수가 이 사실을 숨긴 채 AI를 쓰고 있을 것임. 그리고 AI를 대필을 해주는 걸 넘어서 세계관이나 설정을 정리해주는 용…
이번에 세무사 시험 논란 좀 찾아보니 어처구니가 없긴 하다 원천징수를 원청징수로 썼던 사람이 100점 만점이라... 이게 아무리 좋게 생각하려고 해도 불가능하지 않나 싶다... 타임라인에서 봤던 의견처럼 더이상 평가가 의미 없는 것 같다 시험이라는 제도 자체를 뜯어고쳐야하는 시점이 아닐까?? 그게 어렵다면 차라리 오픈북에 AI 활용을 포함시키든가 세무사 시험만 문제가 아니라 비슷한 문제가 …
By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.
