现在｜KOSX @kosxai 华东创业与独立开发负责人｜AI 科技公司合伙人 赛道｜Indie Hacker｜前 AI 产品经理｜产品洞察/段子手 在做｜FlareMo 笔记｜Cherina Pod 双语播客
Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.
| Metric | Today | Yesterday | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tweet views | ≥ 9,122 | ≥ 358K | ≥ 674K | ≥ 674K | ≥ 674K |
| Posts | 12 | 22 | ≥ 50 | ≥ 50 | ≥ 50 |
| Replies sent | 57 | 162 | ≥ 247 | ≥ 247 | ≥ 247 |
| Growth | +144 | +489 | — | — | — |
| Avg views / post | 10.3K | 10.3K | 10.3K | 10.3K | 10.3K |
| Top post | ≥ 3,528 | ≥ 50.2K | ≥ 201K | ≥ 201K | ≥ 201K |
This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 10-09 10:49), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.
X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". The amber bar beside each cycle is the estimate kept from before it was paid, to show how close it came. "This cycle so far" is an estimate, always $ per million views × this cycle's views (average daily tweet views over the last 14 days, replies included, retweets not, × days elapsed). Accounts with a known payout use their own rate (payout ÷ that cycle's views, with 14 days of the account's average daily views standing in where that cycle wasn't fully collected); others use the site-wide average, currently $143.49. The average comes from 79 accounts with a known payout. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.
花叔的 AI 泔水是真多啊。小白的钱还是好赚啊。不看不知道，一看吓一跳。 原来这就是我们大名鼎鼎的克劳德作家——花叔啊。 有机会我一定亲自去下一个盗版全集，好好观摩一下，写的究竟是什么圣经。 至于为什么不买正版？我怕脏了我的钱包。
花叔这篇原帖被删了。估计是被骂惨了。好在我截图了。带大家回忆一下原声大碟！互联网是存在记忆的。 我只想说：不能吃饱了饭，把锅砸了。吃相要好看一点。什么都拿来搞流量，只会遭到反噬。 GitHub 不是傻逼的牛皮癣广告台。
国内很多程序员骨子里都有一个致命的执念： 觉得只有写代码才是真本事。 前两天 V2EX 上有个帖子很典型。一个在国企干了五年的程序员，负责方案设计、跟业务方沟通系统，考核一直拿优秀，甚至刚提拔带团队。 结果他觉得手里的活越来越偏管理、离底层技术越来越远，觉得没技术要完蛋，毅然裸辞回出租屋学技术。 结果辞职三个月，技术没学明白，整个人先垮了，天天失眠内耗，甚至觉得活着毫无意义。 很多技术人天然把写代码当成安全感的唯一来源，觉得坐在屏幕前…
哈哈哈哈花叔您玩不起了？ 您老人家多担待，我不是针对您。 作为 AI 互联网的顶流，您应该起到表率作用，不要搞劣币驱逐良币那一套了。营造一个尊重原创、尊重作品、尊重实力的互联网环境，对我们每个创作者都有好处。 您说呢？假装自己不会写代码，耍猴呢？
By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.
