xpaimingxpaimingX account data monitor
Home / Accounts / star_flow_ai
star_flow_ai@star_flow_ai
Followers —Tweets 10-03 20:58
—Followers
—7-day growth · updating
2357d avg views / post
0Titles won

Health

Building up data
Avg views / post, 7d
235
From 2 tweets past 24h
View efficiency
—
Peer median 34.6% (236 accounts)
Views vs prior week
—
Last 7d avg vs previous 7d · needs 14 days of tweets
Growth vs prior week
—
Last 7d vs previous 7d · needs 14 days of snapshots

Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.

Overview

By UTC day · snapshots about every 6 hours
MetricTodayYesterday7 days14 days30 days
Tweet views≥ 78.6K≥ 1,877≥ 80.4K≥ 80.4K≥ 80.4K
Posts2≥ 4≥ 6≥ 6≥ 6
Replies sent80≥ 15≥ 95≥ 95≥ 95
Growth—————
Avg views / post235235235235235
Top post≥ 145≥ 344≥ 344≥ 344≥ 344

This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 10-02 17:32), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.

Last 30 days

Light bar = incomplete day · gray dot = no data

Daily views

Last 30 days
0
20.0K
40.0K
60.0K
80.0K
09/0509/1209/1909/26Today

Daily follower change

Building up data

Daily posts

Last 30 days
0
1
2
3
4
09/0509/1209/1909/26Today

Daily replies sent

Last 30 days
0
20
40
60
80
09/0509/1209/1909/26Today

X creator revenue

Paid every 14 days · next in 6 days
9.25 payout—This cycle so far≥ $235est.

Revenue per payout

Last 1 payouts · every 14 days
0
$100
$200
$300
Now

X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". "This cycle so far" is an estimate: accounts with a known payout are prorated by day from their latest one (÷ 14 days × days elapsed); others start from their average daily tweet views over the last 14 days (replies included, retweets not), turn that into a full cycle as $24.3 × (views per day)^0.25, and prorate by days elapsed. Fitted on 74 reviewed reports. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.

Top recent tweets

Top 5 by views · last 30 days
1

听说“玩 AI 不知道 L 站,约等于程序员不知道 GitHub”, 不是我不想进,实在是那个破网站太恶心了; 今天有捏着🤏鼻子搞了一遍,花了 1.8 买个邀请码, 终于成功进场了 。 忍不住吐槽下,L 站的注册、登录是我玩互联网以来遇到过最差的! 注册过程一波三折: 访问 invite 页面 ------ 需要国内IP、不能用科学上网 选择 Github 授权登录 ------ 又需要科学上网 点开邮箱连接接受邀请 ------ …

10-02 20:48Views 344Likes 6Replies 4Engagement 2.9%
Open ↗
2

弱弱的问一下: 你们发推写 X 的 LOGO 是怎么打出来的? 要装什么特殊输入法,还是从别人的帖子复制粘贴?

10-02 23:21Views 333Likes 5Replies 5Engagement 3.0%
Open ↗
3

Plus 是真不经用,一个没用过的号吩咐一个任务, 输出都还没铺满屏幕,就达到了 5 小时上限, 这能在重置前蹬完吗? 还是用 Antigrayity 多账号蹬得畅快!

10-02 23:44Views 293Likes 3Replies 1Engagement 1.4%
Open ↗
4

要是能在考四、六级前用上这种神器,那不得起飞🛫

10-03 16:48Views 145Likes 4Replies 1Engagement 3.4%
Open ↗
5

写插件排查 𝕏 网页结构时,有一个疑惑: 为什么 𝕏 的发帖框(https://x.com/compose/post)和排期设置(https://x.com/compose/post/schedule),不搞普通的组件弹窗,非要搞成带 URL 的「路由式弹窗」? 问了下 AI ,原来有这些优势: 1、用户手势左滑或按后退键,刚好关掉弹窗,绝对不会误跳出丢稿; 2、/compose/post 和 /unsent/scheduled …

10-02 17:32Views 125Likes 4Replies 1Engagement 4.0%
Open ↗

Titles

0 total
🌐 World boardNo titles yet

By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.