Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 14.5KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:26
BScore 62
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
49
Views per post ≈ 74.4% of followers · ahead of 49% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
44
Followers +1.68% in 7 days · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
71
15.9 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 71% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
184 posts in the last 10 days, on 10 of them
Content consistency
70
The top post took 32% of 14-day views (43 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence184 posts in the last 10 days, on 10 of them
Engagement quality15.9 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 71% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers +1.68% in 7 days · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
