Posts regularly and each one performs evenly — a consistently run account.
Followers 200KDiagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 15:19
BScore 66
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are −14% versus the previous 7 days — no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
57
Views per post ≈ 20.4% of followers · ahead of 57% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
56
Followers +0.39% in 7 days · ahead of 56% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
54
5.3 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 54% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
96
337 posts in the last 14 days, on 13 of them
Content consistency
96
The top post took 4% of 14-day views (121 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence337 posts in the last 14 days, on 13 of them
Content consistencyThe top post took 4% of 14-day views (121 posts)
To improve
No clear weak spot.
Suggestions
Keep the current rhythm, and keep an eye on the lowest score above.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
