Posts regularly and each one performs evenly — a consistently run account.
Followers 95.6KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:30
BScore 61
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are −44% versus the previous 7 days — no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
67
Views per post ≈ 80.9% of followers · ahead of 67% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
64
Followers +1.43% in 7 days · ahead of 64% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
17
2.6 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 17% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
291 posts in the last 14 days, on 14 of them
Content consistency
68
The top post took 33% of 14-day views (142 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence291 posts in the last 14 days, on 14 of them
Content consistencyThe top post took 33% of 14-day views (142 posts)
To improve
Engagement quality2.6 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 17% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Plenty of views, little interactionWhat to doEnd posts with a clear question and answer the first few replies.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether likes and replies per 1,000 views have gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
