Growing clearly faster than similar-size accounts — on the way up.
Followers 22.3KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:30
BScore 62
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
44
Views per post ≈ 56.2% of followers · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
76
Followers +5.74% in 7 days · ahead of 76% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
43
5.9 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 43% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
100
184 posts in the last 11 days, on 11 of them
Content consistency
62
The top post took 38% of 14-day views (143 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence184 posts in the last 11 days, on 11 of them
Growth momentumFollowers +5.74% in 7 days · ahead of 76% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Engagement quality5.9 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 43% of similar-size accounts
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 56.2% of followers · ahead of 44% of similar-size accounts
Suggestions
Plenty of views, little interactionWhat to doEnd posts with a clear question and answer the first few replies.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether likes and replies per 1,000 views have gone up.
Views lag behind the follower countWhat to doLook at the top tweets by views and reuse their topics and openings.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether views per post ÷ followers has gone up.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
