Growing clearly faster than similar-size accounts — on the way up.
Followers 35.1KDiagnosed on 2026-11-03Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:30
AScore 80
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are +2% versus the previous 7 days — no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
84
Views per post ≈ 444.2% of followers · ahead of 84% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
85
Followers +6.16% in 7 days · ahead of 85% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
93
41.0 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 93% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
42
8 posts in the last 14 days, on 8 of them
Content consistency
91
The top post took 22% of 14-day views (7 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Engagement quality41.0 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 93% of similar-size accounts
Content consistencyThe top post took 22% of 14-day views (7 posts)
To improve
Posting cadence8 posts in the last 14 days, on 8 of them
Suggestions
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
