Most of its reach comes from replying under other people's posts; original posts are fewer.
Followers 6,984Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 21:38
CScore 40
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Can't compare yetNeeds at least 3 tweets past 24h in each of the last two weeks.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
47
Views per post ≈ 40.8% of followers · ahead of 47% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
4
Followers -0.49% in 7 days · ahead of 4% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
50
12.5 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 50% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
84
133 posts in the last 11 days, on 8 of them
Content consistency
27
The top post took 74% of 14-day views (53 posts)
Findings
Strengths
Posting cadence133 posts in the last 11 days, on 8 of them
To improve
Growth momentumFollowers -0.49% in 7 days · ahead of 4% of similar-size accounts
Content consistencyThe top post took 74% of 14-day views (53 posts)
Suggestions
Growing slower than similar-size accountsWhat to doReply under bigger accounts in your field to reach people who don't follow you yet.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the 7-day growth rate has gone up.
Views are concentrated in a few hitsWhat to doTurn a hit's topic into a series so ordinary posts carry more of the reach.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether the top post's share of views has come down.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
