Growing clearly faster than similar-size accounts — on the way up.
Followers 49Diagnosed on 2026-10-11Followers 10-11 20:07Tweets 10-11 15:21
SScore 88
Reach check
Against the account's own previous week; not part of the score
Views look normalMedian views per post are −25% versus the previous 7 days — no sign of a sharp drop.
Scores by dimension
Out of 100 · 50 = the median of similar-size accounts
View efficiency
99
Views per post ≈ 639.5% of followers · ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
Growth momentum
92
Followers +2.04% in 7 days · ahead of 92% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality
99
89.4 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
Posting cadence
44
10 posts in the last 14 days, on 8 of them
Content consistency
89
The top post took 22% of 14-day views (8 posts)
Findings
Strengths
View efficiencyViews per post ≈ 639.5% of followers · ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
Engagement quality89.4 likes and replies per 1,000 views · ahead of 99% of similar-size accounts
To improve
Posting cadence10 posts in the last 14 days, on 8 of them
Suggestions
Posting is patchyWhat to doSettle into at least one post a day before adding volume.How to checkIn two weeks, see whether more of the 14 days had a post.
The reach check compares the medians of the last two weeks; it shows a change in views, not its cause. The diagnosis uses only public data collected by this site: the account's own original posts (no retweets or replies), counted once a tweet is past 24h. View efficiency, growth and engagement are scored by rank among similar-size accounts (⅓–3× the followers); cadence and consistency by the account's own posting. A dimension without enough data is not scored and stays out of the total. For reference only — it says nothing about the account's standing on X.
