xpaimingxpaimingX account data monitor
Home / Accounts / ZC | AI & 宏观拆解
ZC | AI & 宏观拆解@zcswl7961ai#110 global growth

👨‍💻 程序员TL,也是经济学爱好者 🤖 深入研究 AI Agent 架构、Harness 实践与工程落地踩坑 📊 用工程师的数据视角,从新闻、研报和生活里琢磨经济怎么影响普通人 📌 用图表与长文,深度拆解经济学与 AI 前沿

Followers 11-03 08:07Tweets 11-03 09:37
3,629Followers
3,874Following
+1,3037-day growth
6,9217d avg views / post
0Titles won
Avg views / post, 7d
6,921
From 23 tweets past 24h
View efficiency
Views per post ≈ 190.7% of followers
Peer median 68.3% (284 accounts)
Views vs prior week
+625.8%
Last 7d avg vs previous 7d
Growth vs prior week
-10.7%
Last 7d vs previous 7d
This account
190.7%
Peer median
68.3%

Health is a trend reference from public data only. It says nothing about the account's standing on X; X's own status is authoritative.

Overview

By UTC day · snapshots about every 6 hours
MetricTodayYesterday7 days14 days30 days
Tweet views≥ 308≥ 67.6K≥ 333K≥ 522K≥ 523K
Posts31187339366
Replies sent434832,8753,9984,350
Growth+21+183+1,303+2,762—
Avg views / post6,9216,9216,9216,9216,921
Top post≥ 58≥ 22.0K≥ 93.4K≥ 93.4K≥ 93.4K

This page counts only the account's own tweets; retweets are excluded. Avg views / post uses tweets past 24h only. "≥" means the window still holds tweets gathering views / replies, or only part of it was updated (earliest update: 10-01 23:36), so the real value is at least this; "—" means data is incomplete, not zero.

Last 30 days

Light bar = incomplete day · gray dot = no data

Daily views

Last 30 days
0
50.0K
100K
150K
10/0610/1310/2010/27Today

Daily follower change

Last 30 days
0
+100
+200
+300
+400
10/0610/1310/2010/27Today

Daily posts

Last 30 days
0
20
40
60
80
10/0610/1310/2010/27Today

Daily replies sent

Last 30 days
0
200
400
600
800
10/0610/1310/2010/27Today

X creator revenue

Paid every 14 days · next in 3 days
10.23 payout—Estimated$1.79This cycle so far$53.51est.Account rate—Site average$131.62per million views

Revenue per payout

Last 3 payouts · every 14 days
0
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
10/0910/23Now
CollectedEstimate

X doesn't publish creator payouts. Paid cycles only show collected figures: "Verified" = checked and entered by us, "Tweet" = the amount the account posted itself (verified), "Reported" = a reviewed user report; nothing collected means "—". The amber bar beside each cycle is the estimate kept from before it was paid, to show how close it came. "This cycle so far" is an estimate, always $ per million views × this cycle's views (average daily tweet views over the last 14 days, replies included, retweets not, × days elapsed). Accounts with a known payout use their own rate (payout ÷ that cycle's views, with 14 days of the account's average daily views standing in where that cycle wasn't fully collected); others use the site-wide average, currently $131.62. The average comes from 333 accounts with a known payout. A ballpark only. Know the real figure? Use "Report revenue" above.

Top recent tweets

Top 5 by views · last 30 days
1

最近在团队代码 Review 时发现了一个特别危险的苗头: 大家用 AI 助手写代码越来越上头,编辑器里 Tab 键敲得飞快,一整段完美的逻辑几秒钟就吐出来了。 但只要稍微追问一句:“这个高并发场景下的事务隔离级别为什么选这个?” 对方瞬间卡壳。 AI 让写代码的“手速”提高了十倍,但也彻底剥夺了程序员对底层工程细节的“警惕性”。 大家都把 AI 当成了不报错的黑盒,直到生产环境突发内存泄漏,才发现自己根本不懂 AI 到底写了啥。 把…

10-30 18:53Views 93.4KLikes 135Replies 63Engagement 0.2%
Open ↗
2

很多人觉得 AI 发展起来后,最先失业的是初级码农(CRUD 仔)。 但作为一个带团队的 TL,在实测过几十种 AI 辅助开发工具后,我得到了一个完全相反的结论: AI 最先淘汰的,恰恰是那些“不上不上”的中层架构师。 为什么? 初级码农成本低,现在加上 AI 赋能,一个人能干过去三个人的活,产出性价比极高; 而部分中层架构师,天天开会做 PPT、画流程图,自己不写代码,技术细节落后于最前沿的 AI 工具,管理成本还极高。 当基础程序…

10-28 09:29Views 38.4KLikes 113Replies 63Engagement 0.5%
Open ↗
3

深夜跟几个大厂的架构师聊天,大家不约而同达成了一个细思极恐的共识: 以前,写一手优雅、规范、高并发的业务代码是程序员安身立命的护城河,能换取高额的薪资溢价。 而现在,当 AI 能够一秒钟吐出标准模板时,“写代码”这件事彻底沦为了毫无壁垒的通货。 当技术门槛被大模型夷为平地,程序员如果还把核心竞争力局限在“熟练工种”上,离被降维优化真的只有一步之遥。 在 AI 已经把代码“平权”的今天,你觉得程序员的核心溢价到底在转移到哪里?

11-02 21:22Views 22.0KLikes 71Replies 27Engagement 0.4%
Open ↗
4

很多创业公司老板以为接入大模型后,就能把年前积攒的历史“屎山代码”一口气重构掉。 直到上周我们用 Agent 尝试去跑一个沉淀了 5 年的遗留业务模块: 大模型不仅没有理解复杂的隐式依赖,反而用极其优雅的代码规范,把原有的业务逻辑漏洞重写了一遍,测试环境当场崩溃。 AI 根本不懂什么叫业务历史妥协,它只会给你生成外观精美、底层剧毒的“新屎山”。 在你们公司,有人真的敢把旧系统的核心重构彻底交给 AI 吗?

11-02 08:32Views 12.6KLikes 46Replies 49Engagement 0.8%
Open ↗
5

做底层架构,还得被催着升中层?你怎么跟外行解释自己的工作?

10-26 12:54Views 9,656Likes 38Replies 12Engagement 0.5%
Open ↗

Titles

0 total
🌐 World boardNo titles yet

By UTC day: the growth title goes to #1 on that day's board, the posts / replies sent / views titles to #1 among the tweets collected that day. Today's entries can still change.

Similar accounts

ai